Latest Album

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut rhoncus risus mauris, et commodo lectus hendrerit ac.

banner
RORY ROLLINS
Temple of Perdition/Uncategorized /A study on satan based on biblical “fact”

A study on satan based on biblical “fact”

I write this in hopes to end the sickening over use and childish attempts in pop culture and religion with the use of the satan and the ties to an evil force that has mystical abilities that can be either feared or worshiped depending on the side of the fence one sits. The Modern “Satan” is a ghost that was never meant to be. It is a pure fabrication of the Chrsitain faith based on a number of sources which most have been deemed non-cannon, but yet seemed to find themselves in their pop-culture doctrines. 

The Word Lucifer also has been tied to satan as a true name does not appear anywhere in the source texts of early bibles and is a mistranslation for from the Vulgate to King James English. It should not be as Lucifer, Latin for the morning star, is a direct reference to Venus as it is the morning star that appeared before the break of dawn. In the account Isaiah where the word Lucifer appears only once refers to the prince of Tyr and not a fallen angel. 

However, regardless of facts and personal agendas and fear mongering we have what we have today being feared by the right hand path as some devil out to destroy mankind and for the left hand path something to revere and be like. A grand advisory that never existed, nor was meant to play any role as a symbol or archetype. Those who use the word are merely playing out the role in Christian fantasy and are themselves a reverse Christian. This means the mountain of books, churches, systems of magic is based on smoke and mirrors based on the works of fiction. There is no power within them and those who write them are no masters but of greed and Ego. 

The English Bibles continue to capitalize the word satan in passages like Job 1 and e passage do not have a specific individual in mind. That is, satan in these passages should not be understood as a proper personal name.

The reason this is the case is a rule of Hebrew grammar. In biblical Hebrew, the definite article (the word “the”) is a single letter (הַ; ha). Hebrew prefixes (attaches) the definite article to a noun (or participle to make it a substantive) so that, like all languages that have definite articles, the noun is made specific. However, biblical Hebrew does not put the definite article (“the”) on proper personal nouns (personal names). An example of this can be seen in English. I don’t call myself “the Mike,” and Hebrew simply does not do this either (at all). In their biblical Hebrew reference grammar, Jouon-Muraoka note, 

“No proper noun of person takes the article, not even when it has the form of an adjective or a participle” 

The Book of Job

Without exception, the word satan in Job occurs with the Hebrew definite article. This indicates quite clearly that satan is not a personal name. It is generic and means “the adversary.” The word can also be used of human beings (1 Sam 29:4; 2 Sam 19:23; 1 Kings 5:18; 1 Kings 11:14). All of these examples have satan without the article, but the referent is a human being, not a divine being, so satan isn’t here either.

Men and Angels

One might ask at this point whether there are instances where satan occurs in the Hebrew Bible without the definite article. If there are such instances, might those occurrences of the term point to the Devil?

In terms of statistics, the noun satan occurs 27 times in the Hebrew Bible. Ten of those occurrences are without the article. Of these ten occurrences, seven refer to human beings and two refer to the Angel of Yahweh. That means nine of the ten instances clearly do not refer to the Devil or proper personal name, Satan.

The lone remainder is 1 Chronicles 21:1. This is the famous passage where satan provokes David to take a census, but in the parallel passage, 2 Samuel 24:1–25, Yahweh provokes David to take the census. Due to this parallel, and due to the fact that satan here has no article, this is viewed by some as the single instance of an evil, cosmic figure called satan in the OT. That’s actually not the case, though.

If one reads the Chronicles account of the census judgment carefully (the one that said satan provoked the act), the destroying Angel is there “with a sword drawn in his hand.” The Hebrew phrasing behind this occurs only three other times: Joshua 5:13 and Numbers 22:23, 31. All three of these references are the Angel of Yahweh, and in one of them (Num. 22:23) he is referred to as “the satan.”

This connection back to the Angel of Yahweh is important. This is because the Angel of Yahweh is at times equated with Yahweh. One could read the Chronicles account in light of that association. The Angel of the Yahweh was the satan figure—both in judgment and in terms of instigation. There is no contradiction.

Lastly, this would in turn mean there are no verses in the Old Testament that have a personal name satan.

What about the Serpent?

The satan in Job is an officer of the divine council (similar to a prosecutor). His job is to “run to and fro throughout the earth” to see who is and who is not obeying Yahweh. When he finds some one who is under Yahweh’s wrath, he “accuses” that person. This is what we see in Job (and in Zechariah 3), and it actually has a distinct New Testament flavor. But the point here is that this satan in Job 1-2 is not evil. In fact, he’s doing his job.

Over time, the idea of “being an adversary in the heavenly council” was applied intellectually to the enemy of God—the nachash (typically rendered “serpent”) in Eden, the one who asserted his own will against Yahweh’s designs. This makes sense because the Fall resulted in humanity being estranged from God because of sin. This situation was caused by the serpent, who becomes the archetypal enemy of God in the biblical story. The serpent therefore understandably became labeled with the term satan because of this adversarial act and its (pardon the pun) fallout. The connection became so familiar that, eventually, satan became a proper personal noun after the Old Testament period during what’s called the Second Temple (“Intertestamental”) Period. This is why the name Satan appears in the New Testament and applied to the enemy of Eden.

This is a good example of how an idea in Israelite religion plays out and is applied in different ways during the progress of revelation. God certainly does have a great enemy in the biblical story, one that surfaces in Eden. The point here is that his enemy never gets called “Satan” until the periods after the Old Testament.

Comment: 1

  • Jason Myers
    Reply December 23, 2019 4:45 am

    Satan… Lucifer… Adjectives, nothing more than adjectives.

Post a Comment